Nano#AFW

Playstyle

60 games

Ranked Solo Ranked Flex

All champions

Viktor71

Cassiopeia56

Orianna

Playstyle radar

60 games

Compared with Master+ mid laners, blended with Master+ players on the same champions.

Axis breakdown

Aggression

Kills, kill participation, solo kills and first bloods

of 100

Damage

Damage per minute and share of the team's damage

of 100

Farming

CS pace, gold income and early-lane farm

of 100

Vision

Vision score, control wards and ward clears

of 100

Objectives

Epic monsters, objective damage and plates

of 100

Survivability

Deaths and time spent dead, inverted: higher is safer

of 100

What to work on

60 games

Nothing stands out below the norm

Every rated stat sits at or above what is typical for mid laners. The strengths below are where the margin is widest.

Strengths

Deaths / min
0.14 vs 0.21
▲ 94vs mid laners
94 of 100 against mid laners, and it matters: the better half of Master+ mid laners wins 71% of games, the other half 33%.
Time spent dead
7% vs 10%
▲ 90vs mid laners
90 of 100 against mid laners, and it matters: the better half of Master+ mid laners wins 68% of games, the other half 36%.
Gold / min
473 vs 433
▲ 82vs mid laners
82 of 100 against mid laners, and it matters: the better half of Master+ mid laners wins 71% of games, the other half 33%.

Identity

Safe Player

Low deaths, low risk, hard to punish.

Among mid laners, survivability leads at 84 of 100, built on 0.14 deaths a minute and 8% time spent dead. Aggression trails at 54, with 1.7 solo kills a game.

Among mid laners

Aggression54
Damage79
Farming83
Vision82
Objectives66
Survivability84

Spell SlingerCasts far more abilities than most