Playstyle radar
12 gamesCompared with Emerald top laners, blended with Emerald players on the same champions.
Axis breakdown
Aggression
Kills, kill participation, solo kills and first bloods
51
of 100
Damage
Damage per minute and share of the team's damage
53
of 100
Farming
CS pace, gold income and early-lane farm
61
of 100
Vision
Vision score, control wards and ward clears
52
of 100
Objectives
Epic monsters, objective damage and plates
57
of 100
Survivability
Deaths and time spent dead, inverted: higher is safer
52
of 100
What to work on
12 gamesNothing stands out below the norm
Every rated stat sits at or above what is typical for top laners. The strengths below are where the margin is widest.
Strengths
Gold / min
481 vs 412
100 of 100 against top laners, and it matters: the better half of Emerald top laners wins 67% of games, the other half 31%.
Epic monsters / game
1.6 vs 0.8
100 of 100 against top laners, and it matters: the better half of Emerald top laners wins 68% of games, the other half 32%.
Objective damage / min
674 vs 395
100 of 100 against top laners, and it matters: the better half of Emerald top laners wins 71% of games, the other half 27%.
Identity
Early read
The playstyle gets a name at 15 games. The shape so far:
An even profile among top laners: farming peaks at 62 while aggression sits at 50, and nothing strays far from the middle of the pack. Games are won a little bit of everywhere.
Among top laners